…—
ObamaCare and the Constitution - WSJ.com
via skooks777 (via hilker) (via obamacare)
That is not true. There is nothing in the bill that requires a person to buy a particular product. All is says is that if you want the tax break, you have to prove you have…
Congress can structure it however it wants; there’s no denying that you will be fined (or taxed, if you prefer) in penalty for not purchasing a product.
Your description makes it sound like the government is being magnanimous by “giving a tax break” to people who purchase insurance. It’s the exact opposite.
-
junior18 reblogged this from sds
-
ducksqueak liked this
-
gaymerlibertarian reblogged this from obamacare
-
steampunkanachronism liked this
-
ajamison liked this
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sdscomments and added:
Your descriptions sounds like the government is being sinister. The government is making it possible for almost all...
-
sdscomments reblogged this from waifsworld and added:
Congress can structure it however it wants; there’s...fined (or taxed,
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sdscomments and added:
From the Christian Science Monitor: Are there penalties if you don’t buy insurance? If you ignore this mandate and don’t...
-
bloggingfromtheright liked this
-
paulpearl liked this
-
gonzofreddie liked this
-
gonzofreddie reblogged this from sds
-
sendmelies liked this
-
sdscomments reblogged this from waifsworld and added:
What in the world are you talking about? What “tax break”? The bill is very clear: if you do not purchase insurance that...
-
senjensenjensen liked this
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sds and added:
That is not true. There is nothing in the bill that requires a person to buy a particular product. All is says is that...
-
girlfriend-ni-superman liked this
-
sunsmudge liked this
-
highlysophisticated liked this
-
sds reblogged this from obamacare
-
obamacare reblogged this from hilker
-
justinu84 liked this
-
davereed liked this
-
whakahekeheke liked this
-
hilker posted this
