sds:
“Never before has Congress required people to buy a private product to qualify as a law-abiding citizen.”—
That is not true. There is nothing in the bill that requires a person to buy a particular product. All is says is that if you want the tax break, you have to prove you have insurance.
It is no more unconstitutional than the tax break mortgagees get. ~ waif
What in the world are you talking about? What “tax break”? The bill is very clear: if you do not purchase insurance that meets government requirements, you will be fined.
-
junior18 reblogged this from sds
-
ducksqueak liked this
-
gaymerlibertarian reblogged this from obamacare
-
steampunkanachronism liked this
-
ajamison liked this
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sdscomments and added:
Your descriptions sounds like the government is being sinister. The government is making it possible for almost all...
-
sdscomments reblogged this from waifsworld and added:
Congress can structure it however it wants; there’s...fined (or taxed,
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sdscomments and added:
From the Christian Science Monitor: Are there penalties if you don’t buy insurance? If you ignore this mandate and don’t...
-
bloggingfromtheright liked this
-
paulpearl liked this
-
gonzofreddie liked this
-
gonzofreddie reblogged this from sds
-
sendmelies liked this
-
sdscomments reblogged this from waifsworld and added:
What in the world are you talking about? What “tax break”? The bill is very clear: if you do not purchase insurance that...
-
senjensenjensen liked this
-
waifsworld reblogged this from sds and added:
That is not true. There is nothing in the bill that requires a person to buy a particular product. All is says is that...
-
girlfriend-ni-superman liked this
-
sunsmudge liked this
-
highlysophisticated liked this
-
sds reblogged this from obamacare
-
obamacare reblogged this from hilker
-
justinu84 liked this
-
davereed liked this
-
whakahekeheke liked this
-
hilker posted this
